[USRP-users] Selling my E110

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[USRP-users] Selling my E110

Martin Braun via USRP-users

Dear all,
I'm selling my E110 for half the price. Bought from Ettus last year for academic purpose
Please email [hidden email] if interested

On Oct 4, 2016 12:02 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Send USRP-users mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of USRP-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Sam Carey)
   2. Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? (John DeLeong)
   3. Re: Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
      (Dave NotTelling)
   4. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Long, Jeffrey P.)
   5. Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements (Rigney, Kevin E)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:14:32 -0400
From: Sam Carey <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hey Jeff,

I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code, change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.

-Sam





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:30:00 +0800
From: John DeLeong <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,

Can the USRP B210
a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b3825c42/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:44:21 -0400
From: Dave NotTelling <[hidden email]>
To: John DeLeong <[hidden email]>
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of
        WIFI?
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

John,

     Check out https://github.com/bastibl/gr-ieee802-11

V/R,

-Dave

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:30 AM, John DeLeong via USRP-users <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can the USRP B210
> a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
> b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b870419a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:04:23 +0000
From: "Long, Jeffrey P." <[hidden email]>
To: Sam Carey <[hidden email]>, "[hidden email]"
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Sam-

Thanks for the reply. That sounds like an easy fix.
Just out of curiosity can you tell me what OS, vivado version, etc. you are using.

Thanks
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Carey [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey P.; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large

Hey Jeff,

I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code, change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.

-Sam



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:10:08 +0000
From: "Rigney, Kevin E" <[hidden email]>
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [USRP-users] Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,

What is the best data-link (PCI-E, 10GbE) to use with an X3X0 running two Twin RX receivers at full rate? That setup would be two daughterboards streaming a total of 4 channels of 80MS/s floating-point complex data back to a computer. The pages for both the 10GbE card and PCI-E card say they support 200MS/S in full-duplex mode. Can they run at 320MS/s in one direction?

Thanks,

Kevin Rigney

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/4527f3b3/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


------------------------------

End of USRP-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 3
*****************************************

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [USRP-users] Selling my E110

Martin Braun via USRP-users

Or you can also email [hidden email]

On Oct 4, 2016 7:14 AM, "Joe Y. Mambu" <[hidden email]> wrote:

Dear all,
I'm selling my E110 for half the price. Bought from Ettus last year for academic purpose
Please email [hidden email] if interested

On Oct 4, 2016 12:02 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Send USRP-users mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of USRP-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Sam Carey)
   2. Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? (John DeLeong)
   3. Re: Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
      (Dave NotTelling)
   4. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Long, Jeffrey P.)
   5. Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements (Rigney, Kevin E)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:14:32 -0400
From: Sam Carey <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hey Jeff,

I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code, change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.

-Sam





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:30:00 +0800
From: John DeLeong <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,

Can the USRP B210
a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b3825c42/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:44:21 -0400
From: Dave NotTelling <[hidden email]>
To: John DeLeong <[hidden email]>
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of
        WIFI?
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

John,

     Check out https://github.com/bastibl/gr-ieee802-11

V/R,

-Dave

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:30 AM, John DeLeong via USRP-users <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can the USRP B210
> a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
> b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b870419a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:04:23 +0000
From: "Long, Jeffrey P." <[hidden email]>
To: Sam Carey <[hidden email]>, "[hidden email]"
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Sam-

Thanks for the reply. That sounds like an easy fix.
Just out of curiosity can you tell me what OS, vivado version, etc. you are using.

Thanks
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Carey [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey P.; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large

Hey Jeff,

I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code, change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.

-Sam



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:10:08 +0000
From: "Rigney, Kevin E" <[hidden email]>
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [USRP-users] Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,

What is the best data-link (PCI-E, 10GbE) to use with an X3X0 running two Twin RX receivers at full rate? That setup would be two daughterboards streaming a total of 4 channels of 80MS/s floating-point complex data back to a computer. The pages for both the 10GbE card and PCI-E card say they support 200MS/S in full-duplex mode. Can they run at 320MS/s in one direction?

Thanks,

Kevin Rigney

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/4527f3b3/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


------------------------------

End of USRP-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 3
*****************************************

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com